Fantasy Court

Opinions

Kristen v. Vince (2026)

No. 26-1531-2
Bears Break Eagles, Power Ranking Fantasy Buy-Low (and Sell-Low) Targets, and the End of '80s Month (September 30, 2026)
Justice Kelly delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Heifetz and Justice Horlbeck joined. Justice Horlbeck filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A loser punishment two years overdue is enforced by specific performance and weekly point deductions, not by another extension. A member readmitted on his own promise to complete it may be expelled if he does not.

Noah v. Commissioner (2026)

No. 26-1531-1
Bears Break Eagles, Power Ranking Fantasy Buy-Low (and Sell-Low) Targets, and the End of '80s Month (September 30, 2026)
Chief Justice Heifetz delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Kelly and Justice Horlbeck joined. Justice Horlbeck filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A Commissioner who solicits the league’s views through a channel he knows no one reads has not given notice, and he may not keep a player he claimed from a ten-year-old on the strength of the silence he engineered. Chris Olave returns to the child.

Ben v. Stephen (2026)

No. 26-1527-1
Dart Goes Down, Power Ranking the Best Fantasy Buy-Low Trade Targets, Fantasy Court, and Laxative Max (September 23, 2026)
Chief Justice Heifetz delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Kelly and Justice Horlbeck joined. Justice Kelly filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A manager who knowingly trades Jahmyr Gibbs for nothing, and whose league votes the trade through, has lost Jahmyr Gibbs. The Commissioner may not void the trade after the count, and no draft-pick sanction may be substituted for it.

Rachel v. Commissioner (2026)

No. 26-1485-1
Power Ranking Instant Fantasy Regrets After Week 1, Fantasy Court, and Craig Got Stabbed at the Emmys (September 16, 2026)
Justice Horlbeck delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Heifetz and Justice Kelly joined. Chief Justice Heifetz filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A Commissioner who neglected to implement a duly adopted kick return scoring rule before Week 1 may not switch it on after the week’s games have ended so as to award eight additional points to his own starting player in his own matchup; the rule shall be applied retroactively to every other team’s Week 1 total and prospectively to all teams from Week 2 onward, but the Commissioner’s own Week 1 score stands under the settings as he left them.

In re the Prodigal League Member (2026)

No. 26-1490-1
Power Ranking the Best Week 1 Story Lines, the Michigan Mulligan, and the Listener Take Purge (September 9, 2026)
Justice Horlbeck delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Heifetz and Justice Kelly joined. Justice Kelly filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A league member who quits the league and forfeits his stake has no right to reinstatement once the league has reassigned his team, and the league should decline to readmit him. His buy-in should nonetheless be returned so that he holds nothing over the league.

In re Blind Swap of the Third and Fourth Overall Rookie Picks (2026)

No. 26-1478-1
Best Rookie Fantasy Landing Spots + Our 2026 Dynasty Superflex Rankings (May 1, 2026)
Justice Kelly delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Heifetz and Justice Horlbeck joined, neither having recused. Chief Justice Heifetz filed a concurring opinion.
Held: A blind, sight-unseen swap of dynasty draft picks agreed to by handshake is a valid trade and may be processed, however insane it looks once the picks are revealed.

In re Trophy Construction Delinquency (2025)

No. 25-1431-1
Power Ranking NFL Rules We Want Changed, the One Second Christmas Song Challenge, and Fantasy Court (December 24, 2025)
Justice Kelly delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Held: A championship-eligible league member who has failed to complete prior-season punishment obligations owes both the original punishment (trophy construction) and the current season’s loser punishment (Beef Week) regardless of championship outcome. Immediate enforcement through daily point deductions beginning December 26 is appropriate, with prospective 40-point weekly deductions for continued non-compliance in subsequent seasons.

Steve v. Pat (2025)

No. 25-1427-1
Power Ranking the Best/Worst Trades of 2025, Craig Vs. Sean Toilet Bowl, Fantasy Court, and Michael Bublé (No, Really) (December 17, 2025)
Justice Horlbeck delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Kelly joined. Chief Justice Heifetz filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
Held: A commissioner must recognize and enforce the transfer of dynasty league draft picks wagered and lost in a golf match between two league members, where the wager occurred between the parties themselves as a personal competition and the consideration remained entirely within the fantasy football system.

Tim v. League (2025)

No. 25-1423-1
Power Ranking Which QBs Could Change Teams, Eagles Therapy and a Fantasy Recap With Chris Ryan, Plus Fantasy Court (December 10, 2025)
Justice Kelly delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Held: A fantasy manager who has been mathematically eliminated from playoff contention may not deliberately bench his starting quarterback—leaving the position empty—to throw a matchup and manipulate another team’s playoff qualification. While suboptimal lineup choices remain permissible gamesmanship, leaving roster positions vacant crosses the line into impermissible sabotage. The petition is dismissed as moot where the challenged conduct would have had no practical effect.

In re Last Place Determination (2025)

No. 25-1419-1
The “It’s Overtime; Which Team Do You Trust?” Draft, Ringer Fantasy Punishments, and Erotic Hyena Facts (December 3, 2025)
Justice Horlbeck delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Held: In fantasy leagues with punishment systems, “last place” is properly determined by toilet bowl tournament results among non-playoff teams—not by consulting Week 14 standings and calling it a day.
...